Boob Said HUGO Was A Scam At $3.82 Last Week
Q: Still a scam. Amazing what a little criminal manipulation can do to a stock price, isn't it? Keep your slanty eyes on them there Mongolians (if there actually are any Mongolians involved in the Vancouver/Singapore based swindle system). Last $4.60.
A:
In other words, I care about whether the companies underlying my
stock certificates (yeah, I know, many of youse guise have never
even SEEN one of those dudes) are gonna SURVIVE long enough to
be worth something to keep me alive three to five YEARS from now.
I had this year covered 3-5 years ago, cash in full, no hemming nor
hawing about
next. Already got it. Made the money 3-5 years ago (more accurately
set the trades in motion which have been producing the cash this
year). It's that time frame 3-5 years from now that concerns me.
I know it's a little inpolite of me to mention it, but the
reality is that the people I've been able to continue talking
with over more than a few years, in this forum or in private
emails, are those with a lengthier trading horizon. Seems all
the gnats keep wiping themselves out. They don't even need the
help of his British Lordship the criminal mastermind Greedspan to
do it, either. If anything, Greedie is helping keep them alive,
for what little lifespan they have, by stealing the wealth of an
entire nation built over generations to squander it on short term
market manipulations, contributions to the political campaigns of
criminally corrupt Constitution abrogating pollies, and a few bucks
for carrying on homosexual Xian crusades and Abu Ghraib exhibitions
of criminal abrogation of humanity against sovereign nations around
the world, destroying not only the underlying productive capacity
of the United States but also its financial system in the process.
Even funnier (and more impolite for me to mention it) is that
when I first started out more than 42 years ago, I was just like
youse guise, "mostly" ignorant about companies (although I did have
the good sense, even then, to read the company reports which
virtually all of youse refuse adamantly to do), trading the ultra
short term squiggles, even day trading until Assassination Day in
1963 permanently disproved the feasibility of that exercise. What
it is: Been there, done that, ain't gonna do that no more, no how.
Making more money devoid of necessity for hyping anything to
anybody (never did that RoboHype kind of nonsense anyway) so as to
create a flow of "greater fools" for the hyped moichandice. Dunno,
I suppose there will be another crop of gnats when y'all are gone.
Wanna explain my only purchases this year which were closed end
muni bond funds? No, never mind, you don't even know about the
writeups I did when I did those only purchases this year nor would
you undertand my efforts to provide cash (in amounts significant to
me) via the cubes to do my part to support the market during the
crash of the NASDAQ since you didn't start trading until after my
series "My Plan for the Cubes" which was all ultra short term
support activity from the long side. None of those things were
long time horizon value stock picks (in fact I abhorred the contents
of the cubes throughout the time I was trading them and only later
got a couple of decent trades in the under the counter market).
My ulterior agenda, so subtle that it went right past you every
time I mentioned it, is strictly didactic. I get my facts from
the SEC web site, gathering that info into TC2000 which also
provides some nice fractals of charting for me, and using eSignal
for real time quotes and charts when I get down to the floor with
executable orders. In fact, I have gotten a very few good ideas
from reading m.i.s. The origins of my wildly successful ATML
trade, best of the year 2002, were in fact in this group from a
guy who asked whether it might have some value, got a flat out no
from one of the gnats hereabouts, but reminded me of my inability
to exclude the durn thing during previous studies of the cubes and
suggested to me that I might do a full analysis of the stock which
demonstrated to me that it *did* satisfy value criteria at its
then current prices. Another was also an inversion of what was
said in this group about AMD which has been one of my best trading
stocks since 960402 when I began trading its nice long swings.
"Bankrupt" was the insistent word in this forum, totally devoid
of validation in the financial reports of the company (as seen
through MY standards which you often refer to as unduly harsh),
totally devoid of recognition of the many prior successes the
company had had going up against "the 800 pound gorilla". So yes,
I am a lot more *fact* oriented than your notion of "collaborating"
stocks to where you "want" them to go regardless of their lack of
value or relevance to humanity.